<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Double-Edge of Deflection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debate or Discuss</title>
		<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/#comment-53032</link>
		<dc:creator>Debate or Discuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindfulconstruct.com/?p=352#comment-53032</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/#comment-47941</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 03:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindfulconstruct.com/?p=352#comment-47941</guid>
		<description>This is so what I am experiencing at the present moment.  I am having family issues that cannot be resolved specifically because of deflection.  No one wants to take responsibility for their words or their actions so they deflect instead and invalidate everything I am feeling and/or saying to resolve the issue.  Now, one issue has become many, in the deflectors&#039; minds, yet there is only one issue on my mind and until that is resolved or acknowledged, my family and I have parted ways.  Very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so what I am experiencing at the present moment.  I am having family issues that cannot be resolved specifically because of deflection.  No one wants to take responsibility for their words or their actions so they deflect instead and invalidate everything I am feeling and/or saying to resolve the issue.  Now, one issue has become many, in the deflectors&#8217; minds, yet there is only one issue on my mind and until that is resolved or acknowledged, my family and I have parted ways.  Very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Karnaze</title>
		<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/#comment-41499</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Karnaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindfulconstruct.com/?p=352#comment-41499</guid>
		<description>Heater, it&#039;s similar to the statements above it because it follows the formula: &quot;You are doing this (instead of doing that).&quot; 

&quot;You are defending your actions, instead of apologizing to me for what you did.&quot; 

Yes, it&#039;s based on my definition of a genuine apology, as an action. 

In terms of invalidation -- any time someone says that they&#039;re sorry to you but then they defend their actions as justification or as if to minimize the situation, it invalidates their apology, which means they invalidate your pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heater, it&#8217;s similar to the statements above it because it follows the formula: &#8220;You are doing this (instead of doing that).&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;You are defending your actions, instead of apologizing to me for what you did.&#8221; </p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s based on my definition of a genuine apology, as an action. </p>
<p>In terms of invalidation &#8212; any time someone says that they&#8217;re sorry to you but then they defend their actions as justification or as if to minimize the situation, it invalidates their apology, which means they invalidate your pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heater</title>
		<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/#comment-41379</link>
		<dc:creator>Heater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindfulconstruct.com/?p=352#comment-41379</guid>
		<description>I like this! I am kind of confused about one of the deflections you mention, though: &quot;You&#039;re not really sorry when you still defend your actions.&quot;

Why isn&#039;t this a destructive deflection? It sounds a lot like telling the other person how they feel and invalidating them. Do you see sorry as something other than a feeling? Or is there something else I&#039;m missing about this statement?

Of course, it&#039;s all contextual, and there&#039;s often a fine line between justifying actions, defending actions and explaining/exploring them (where explaining/exploring is more like a narration and not a justification). But one thing I appreciate about all the other examples in the list is how clearly they&#039;re constructive and informative -- &quot;clean,&quot; if you will. This one, not so much -- in fact, it seems like it can easily be used to shame and attack, a more nuanced version of &quot;if you loved me, you&#039;d . . .&quot;

Not that I think that&#039;s what you mean, which is I suppose why I&#039;m confused; it does not accord with all the other strong statements on the list.

I look forward to your elucidation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this! I am kind of confused about one of the deflections you mention, though: &#8220;You&#8217;re not really sorry when you still defend your actions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why isn&#8217;t this a destructive deflection? It sounds a lot like telling the other person how they feel and invalidating them. Do you see sorry as something other than a feeling? Or is there something else I&#8217;m missing about this statement?</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s all contextual, and there&#8217;s often a fine line between justifying actions, defending actions and explaining/exploring them (where explaining/exploring is more like a narration and not a justification). But one thing I appreciate about all the other examples in the list is how clearly they&#8217;re constructive and informative &#8212; &#8220;clean,&#8221; if you will. This one, not so much &#8212; in fact, it seems like it can easily be used to shame and attack, a more nuanced version of &#8220;if you loved me, you&#8217;d . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I think that&#8217;s what you mean, which is I suppose why I&#8217;m confused; it does not accord with all the other strong statements on the list.</p>
<p>I look forward to your elucidation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deflection - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://mindfulconstruct.com/2009/01/06/the-double-edge-of-deflection/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>deflection - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindfulconstruct.com/?p=352#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>[...] down on the front wing (I weigh 16 stone) as it is not a lot when I do it, it is pretty stiff. ...The Double-Edge of DeflectionIt doesn&#039;t matter how good they are or if they are dead right truethey have to be deflected so that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down on the front wing (I weigh 16 stone) as it is not a lot when I do it, it is pretty stiff. &#8230;The Double-Edge of DeflectionIt doesn&#39;t matter how good they are or if they are dead right truethey have to be deflected so that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

